Military Operations, History & Cyber Warfare, Miscellaneous Topics

My Thoughts as a Vietnam Veteran About the War Memorial on Veteran’s Day 2015

vietnam war memorial     Recently, someone asked me what I think about when the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington, D.C. comes to mind.  Over the years my thoughts have coalesced into one recurring image and my feelings that go with it.  I am sharing this with you on Veteran’s Day, as a Vietnam 4th Generation Veteran.  I hope my thoughts will strike a cord with you.  God Bless All of Us, and God Bless America.

     I was an aircrew member of an Air Force reconnaissance aircraft that was the last U.S. military aircraft to leave the territorial airspace of South Vietnam on April 30, 1975, the day Saigon fell.  Our bed-down base in Thailand was besieged with all sorts of South Vietnamese Air Force planes when they fled the country.  The planes often landed without any radio contact with our airfield control tower.  After seeing this spectacle, we went to our hootches for the night, but were back on the flightline at 0700 hrs the next morning.  My pal, Jerry, and I just stood there in profound silence, looking at all of those SVAF planes that did not belong there, but, were scattered haphazardly everywhere.  Both of us felt this overwhelming sadness because we had witnessed the death throes of a country until the last twitch from the lifeless body.

     That same profound silence and overwhelming sadness comes back to me whenever I visit the Vietnam Memorial.  It’s a humbling experience, and I’ve never seen anyone who does not have a sense of reverence during their visit to the wall.  It’s only my feeling that the souls listed on the wall are watched over by angels, as it should be, for the supreme sacrifice they each made.  Every one of them deserves that respect and reverence…we can never repay the 58,000 dead.  In a way, the men & women listed on that wall have a level of peace & understanding that their comrades who made it home haven’t had.

     To those 58,000 lost souls, I can only render a hand salute and say: “By the grace of God, from the bottom of my heart, thank-you for your service.”

Standard
Foreign Policy Research & Analysis

Why Does it Appear the White House is Coordinating the Air War Against ISIS Instead of the Pentagon?

Coalition_Airstrike_on_ISIL_position_in_Kobane

The facts on the ground in Syria and Iraq are very complex.  Trying to ensure coalition leadership gets the targeting done right is akin to attempting to pull your kid off of a spinning merry-go-round blindfolded…there’s lots of opportunity to get it wrong. As of today, April 6, 2015, the Coalition nations conducting  airstrikes in Iraq include the United States, Australia, Belgium,  Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.  The Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the United  States, Bahrain, Canada, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab  Emirates.  All of these assets are coordinated through one air component combatant commander for Operation INHERENT RESOLVE. The current ground combatants in Syria for Inherent Resolve includes the Syrian Army, the original Rebel Insurgents who have been trying to topple Bashar Al-Assad’s Administration for the past four plus years, and ISIL.  To be sure, ISIL is clearly a faction of opportunists who took advantage of the civil war raging between the other two groups and accomplished quite a lot in a very short time-frame. Similarly in Iraq, ISIL recognized the disheveled Iraqi Government and a shaky infrastructure, then looked at the semi-autonomous Kurds and decided they could also exploit the disjointed and dysfunctional situation in Iraq. Considering all of this, and there are five Islamic-based countries flying sorties for the coalition, the United States cannot afford to misstep in the bombing campaign.  You ask why the Obama Administration is so heavy handed in managing the air war?  Because this military action could easily become an albatross around President Obama’s neck, and become the legacy he is saddled with as he leaves the White House.  Basically, a situation very reminiscent of the baggage carried by President Bush when he turned over the keys to Obama in January 2009.  Numerous people in and supporting the Obama Administration derided the Bush Administration for overseeing an apparent botched job in OEF and OIF.  The Obama Administration has learned by the school of hard knocks that managing a combat operation in the Middle East is not as easy as it looks. You can look to the Johnson Administration during the Vietnam War and see a President also micro-managing a complex bombing campaign.  Whether you are Lyndon Johnson or Barack Obama, if you are really worried about the “kids not coloring inside the lines,” then you grab the crayons and start coloring the picture yourself.  Take the time to watch the HBO TV-movie from 2002, “Path to War,” about the Johnson White House during the Vietnam War.  It is very instructive in comprehending how a sitting President tried extremely hard to get the right facts about the War raging in Southeast Asia so good, intelligent decisions could be made about the bombing operations in North Vietnam.  I have no doubt there have been many heated discussions within the Obama Administration about Inherent Resolve’s air war, and the constant efforts to get the bombing done correctly for the ground combatants the Coalition is supporting.  But, make no mistake, numerous parallels are eyed every day in and out of the Administration in terms of how things are measuring up to both the Johnson legacy and the Bush legacy. The risk of “getting-it-wrong” in Syria and Iraq is much too high for the Obama team to feel comfortable letting go of the reins.

Steve Miller, Copyright (c) 2015

Standard
Military Operations, History & Cyber Warfare, Miscellaneous Topics

A Commentary on Jewish Military Service in Israel versus Jewish Military Service in the U.S.

In all countries the world over, patriotism and military service know no boundaries, religion or otherwise.  Many Jews served in the German armed forces during WW I.  Members of the Jewish faith were flabbergasted in 1930s when German laws were changed to bar Jews from military service.  Those on active duty at the time were summarily discharged.
The greatest thing about our American way-of-life is: We can choose to serve in the military or not.  People from other countries desire to have these blessings and will volunteer to come join our military.  As for members of the Jewish faith serving in the US. military, I am a 4th generation U.S. serviceman and until right now, I never gave any thought to the religious mix of our military, regardless the faith.
Compulsory military service in Israel relates directly to the country being wedged into a geographically precarious position, and a day does not go by that their sovereignty is not threatened in some way.  If an Israeli citizen is serious in keeping their nation whole, their willingness to serve is critical to the country’s survival.  Citizens of the United States are blessed with an incredible level of prosperity and security compared to the rest of the world.  Faced with global hegemony on a massive scale in World War II from Germany and Japan, Americans at home and abroad had to step-up in some way to protect the lifestyle that so many of their forefathers had already paid the ultimate price.

Steve Miller, Copyright (c) 2008

Standard
Foreign Policy Research & Analysis

The Basic Requirements to Become a U.S. State Department Foreign Service Officer (FSO)

The State Dept has a very rigid system for recruiting, vetting and hiring new FSOs.  Aside from being able to get and retain a Top Secret clearance, you must also agree to accept any foreign posting during your first two years.  Because so many people submit FSO applications and only a small percentage of them get hired, the competition is fierce.  If you are a  typical 20-something college graduate without any demonstrable experience in foreign affairs, not multilingual, or haven’t lived, worked, or traveled outside the U.S. to any appreciable extent, you will need to “level-the-playing-field,” as the saying goes.
If you find yourself in the uphill battle I just described, the first thing to do – and this is almost an automatic thing – is enroll in graduate school to earn a master’s degree. My advice is to pursue the graduate degree as a full-time student and get it behind you as soon as you can.  If your undergraduate degree is in a field-of-study that is not intuitively related to foreign service, then you are better-off studying for a master’s degree that is immediately recognizable as relevant to an FSO career.
When it comes to applying for any job in the 21st century, I will share with you an excerpt from a magazine article I wrote several years ago entitled, “The Professional Employee: How to Find and Keep the Best.”  The three broad skill categories applicable to any job vacancy are:
1.  Technical skills;
2.  Transferable skills;
3.  Fitting-in skills.
Most managers have such busy departments, that when they need to hire  additional help, they opt for a strong emphasis on Technical Skills.  I  call this style of applicant review, “plug n’ play.”  Right or wrong, most managers in today’s world do not feel they share in the responsibility for a new-hire’s success like it was 30 years ago.  I call this style of new employee hiring, “The Steve Miller ‘Swimming Pool’ Theory of Management.”  Simply stated: You throw the new-hire into the deep end of the pool; if they sink to the bottom drain, well, they probably would have failed at some point anyhow…better that we know it now and not waste anymore time on him.  If, however, you pop-to-the-surface, spitting & sputtering and make it to the side of the pool, the boss throws you a towel and says, “welcome to the team.”
I realize my swimming pool theory sounds kind of cynical…but, the reality is not far off-the-mark.  For an aspiring, young FSO, you’re not likely to bring much professional experience (i.e.; technical skills) applicable to the Foreign Service.  The good news, however, is the State Department is not expecting a lot of work history (if any) from their 20-something FSO candidates.  But, the recruiters are going to look very hard at a candidate’s transferable and fitting-in skills.  In fact, U.S. workforce statistics reveal that poor fitting-in skills are the major reason a new-hire is not retained at the end of their probationary period.
Fitting-in skills are extremely difficult to acquire from book learning.  For most of us, our fitting-in skills are closely related to maturity, and life’s living experience.  Fitting-in skills include things like: Cultural sensitivity, accepting constructive criticism, not using profanity, willing to accept and perform well on less attractive work assignments, knows when to shut-up & listen, able to recognize and steer clear of office politics as much as possible, and so on.  Transferable skills can include above average understanding of Microsoft Office applications, thinking through a problem before acting, adept note-taking and telephone skills, solid internet research skills, etc.  Whether you already have some foreign service technical skills, or not, no one is going to hire you as a junior FSO if you have inadequate transferable and/or fitting-in skills.
One of the aspects that catch FSO candidates off-guard is making a career track selection at the time you apply.  There are five FSO career tracks: Consular Officer, Economics Officer, Management Officer, Political Officer and Public Diplomacy Officer.  The duties under each track are fairly broad.  For example: On Monday a Consular Officer might spend the day reviewing foreign national visa applications.  On Tuesday the same Consular Officer might be sent by their manager on a two hour drive to another city to determine what is going on with an American expatriate who was arrested yesterday because the local police decided he was the cause of a car accident.
Most FSO candidates have at least a small notion that living abroad as an FSO is a life of intrigue and adventure.  To that end, Political and Public Diplomacy Officers are seen as the glamor jobs of the Foreign Service.
State Department recruiting information says that if you are successful in getting through the cumbersome vetting process, each would-be new-hire is placed on a career track eligibility list of their choosing.  The lists are kept in candidate seniority order.  Naturally, the two lists for PO, and PDO are heavily impacted, and you could easily wait for a year or more before your name rises to the top of the list to receive a job offer.  The three track lists for Consular, Economic and Management Officer are much shorter (approx 6 months).
Often times the recruiting department will have an officer candidate requirement in Consular, Economic or Management and one or more of the pools doesn’t have enough people on the list.  Under those circumstances, the recruiters will begin contacting FSO candidates from the other lists to offer them a job.  An example might be: A PO candidate has been waiting 10 months to receive a job offer, and her husband is getting perturbed about the length of waiting time.  An FSO recruiter contacts the young lady and offers her a Consular Officer position in Bangladesh.  She’s under no obligation to accept this out-of-track job offer.  The important factor to consider is if she accepts the job to start work sooner, rather than later, she’s removed from the PO track waiting list.  The State Dept cautions candidates accepting assignments from another track list that the first overseas posting (Bangladesh, in our example) is likely to last three years and during that time the new FSO is ineligible to apply for jobs back in their preferred track; they will have to wait to complete the Consular Officer posting, first.  It could be three-to-five years before she can apply to go back on the PO waiting list.
As if all of the foregoing requirements were not enough, I have saved the “best” for last.  As is the case for most entry-level jobs in the U.S. Government, there is often a qualification exam to be taken.  The FSO job is no different in that regard.  I can tell you the FSO qualification exam is easily on a par with the Bar or CPA Exams.  I took the FSO exam four years ago.  I am here to tell you, it is the mother of all exams.  I passed it; but, by time I was finished, I was so wrung-out that I didn’t even care anymore if I passed or failed.  The State Dept has some sample, former test questions, and you can buy a study guide on Amazon.com.  On this exam, book learning is just a fraction of what is needed to pass.  Just about any question you can think of regarding geography, international law, economics, religious studies, world history, the U.S. Constitution, U.S. political studies, wars, famine, etc.   You name it; it’s on there.  To pass this exam, you must be well read, have an intellectual bent, outstanding written & oral communications, and superb analytical skills.

Steve Miller, Copyright (c) 2015

Standard