Foreign Policy Research & Analysis, National Security, Terrorism Information

What actions have been taken so far as a result of the new American anti-terrorism law enacted in December 2015?

The primary thrust of this new law is to mitigate the risk of someone either living in the U.S., or travels there frequently, to become radicalized with terrorist ideals and training while outside the U.S., then comes home to launch a terrorist attack. This law reflects the San Bernardino, CA attack last year, whereby, an Islamic husband and wife (a U.S. citizen and a Foreign National spouse who entered the U.S. legally) traveled outside the U.S., received radicalization training, then returned home and committed a terrorist act.

On January 21st, the first set of revised immigration rules stemming from the new law, were activated. The new rules are as follows:

• Visa Waiver Program. U.S. immigration rules already in effect, provide a special arrangement – called the Visa Waiver Program – which authorizes passport holders from any of the following countries to enter the U.S. for up to 90 days without an entry visa.

VISA WAIVER PROGRAM COUNTRIES

• Andorra

• Australia

• Austria

• Belgium

• Brunei

• Chile

• Czech Republic

• Denmark

• Estonia

• Finland

• France

• Germany

• Greece

• Hungary

• Iceland

• Ireland

• Italy

• Japan

• Latvia

• Liechtenstein

• Lithuania

• Luxembourg

• Monaco

• Netherlands

• New Zealand

• Norway

• Portugal

• Republic of Malta

• San Marino

• Singapore

• Slovakia

• Slovenia

• South Korea

• Spain

• Sweden

• Switzerland

• Taiwan

• United Kingdom

The new immigration rules under the Act specify that travelers in the following categories are no longer eligible to travel or be admitted to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP):

– Nationals of VWP countries who have traveled to or been present in Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria on or after March 1, 2011 (with limited exceptions for travel for diplomatic or military purposes in the service of a VWP country).

– Nationals of VWP countries who are also nationals of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria.

These individuals will still be able to apply for a visa using the regular immigration process at U.S. embassies or consulates. Prior to January 21st, citizens of VWP-eligible countries submitted a request for VWP recognition; this was documented in the Electronic System for Travel Authorizations (ESTAs) to make entries into, and exits from the U.S. ESTA also holds previous traveler information, indicating if they have dual citizenship in Iran, Iraq, Syria or Sudan. If an ESTA approved traveler hits either trip flare – entry to one of the four countries in the past five years, or they are dual citizens of a VWP country AND one of the four countries listed above – those travelers have had their ESTA authorizations revoked. Until they see a U.S. Consular Officer to apply for a visa waiver, they cannot enter the United States. Visa waivers (since they are no longer eligible for an ESTA authorization) are issued on a case-by-case basis…there’s no ready-made rule(s) on what will or will not get someone an approved visa waiver to get back into the U.S.

The Secretary of Homeland Security indicated some of the visa waiver possibilities, such as:

– Travelers to Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria on behalf of international organizations, regional organizations, and sub-national governments on official duty;

– Travelers to Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria on behalf of a humanitarian NGO on official duty;

– Travelers to Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria as a journalist for reporting purposes;

– Travelers to Iran for legitimate business-related purposes following the conclusion of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (July 14, 2015); and

– Travelers to Iraq for legitimate business-related purposes.

Current U.S. passport holders and Foreign Nationals with resident Green Cards already have travel data on-file with Homeland Security in regard to their travel to one of the four, flagged countries, and any dual citizenship thereto. The new rules, so far, do not revoke someone’s Green Card for travel to, or dual citizenship from, the four flagged countries.

Steve Miller, Copyright (c) 2016

Standard
National Security

Understanding the Basics of Obtaining a U.S. Government Security Clearance

security-clearance-process_chart

Nowadays the DOD uses a security clearance processing system that uses predictive modeling to gage the possibility of a security clearance denial.  An actual clearance denial, or revocation of an existing clearance, are significant black marks on a person’s record.  Obviously, the subject person wants to avoid a black mark; but, so does the DOD.

In the majority of situations, whether you are a uniformed member, a DOD civilian, or a contractor’s employee, security clearances are not required prior to stepping into a new, security cleared job.  For any security clearance job, the starting place is the U.S. Gov’ts security questionnaire known as a form “SF-86.”  The SF-86 is completed on-line in a DOD internet application known as “e-QIP.”  The assigned security officer handling your case is the person who sets-up your e-QIP access, and administers the process on your behalf.

Since even a Secret clearance for a recently enlisted 18 year old will take several months to 100% process and reach a final decision, the e-QIP system contains the predictive modeling software.  Based on your form SF-86 answers, e-QIP has the ability to assess key factors and within a few minutes it can issue an “Interim Secret” clearance.  Final hiring decisions are made based on a candidates ability to obtain an Interim Secret.  If e-QIP is unable to grant an Interim Secret clearance, it is NOT considered a denial.  Your application simply lacks enough pre-verifiable info.  Your SF-86 will have to take the usual, laborious route of manual verification by a DOD security officer.  If the officer is unable to grant the clearance, this is considered a denial.

Steve Miller, (c) Copyright 2016

Standard